Personal Crunchology

March 26, 2012 at 9:40pm
0 notes

Modelling behaviour: Game theory in practice | The Economist →

November 9, 2011 at 2:23pm
0 notes

100Plus is a personalized health prediction startup using data analytics and game mechanics to show how small changes in behavior can lead to a longer and better life.

— 100plus.com/#

July 23, 2011 at 11:44pm
0 notes

Kevin Slavin: How algorithms shape our world | Video on TED.com →

June 23, 2011 at 2:23am
0 notes

Algorithms are the new medical tests - O'Reilly Radar →

February 24, 2011 at 12:01am
0 notes

You will commit a crime in the future

— You will commit a crime in the future - The Boston Globe

February 23, 2011 at 8:28pm
35 notes

Personal Data: The Emergence of a New Asset Class,

— Forumblog.org - The World Economic Forum Blog: Rethinking Personal Data

February 9, 2011 at 11:57pm
0 notes

Strata 2011: Posthumans, Big Data, and New Interfaces (via OreillyMedia)

9:19pm
0 notes

Statistical and applied probabilistic knowledge is the core of knowledge; statistics is what tells you if something is true, false, or merely anecdotal; it is the “logic of science”; it is the instrument of risk-taking; it is the applied tools of epistemology; you can’t be a modern intellectual and not think probabilistically—but… let’s not be suckers. The problem is much more complicated than it seems to the casual, mechanistic user who picked it up in graduate school. Statistics can fool you. In fact it is fooling your government right now. It can even bankrupt the system (let’s face it: use of probabilistic methods for the estimation of risks did just blow up the banking system).

— Edge: THE FOURTH QUADRANT: A MAP OF THE LIMITS OF STATISTICS By Nassim Nicholas Taleb

9:18pm
0 notes

The cached wisdom for making such high-stakes predictions is to have experts gather as much evidence as possible, weigh this evidence, and make a judgment. But 60 years of research has shown that in hundreds of cases, a simple formula called a statistical prediction rule (SPR) makes better predictions than leading experts do. Or, more exactly: When based on the same evidence, the predictions of SPRs are at least as reliable as, and are typically more reliable than, the predictions of human experts for problems of social prediction.1

— Statistical Prediction Rules Out-Perform Expert Human Judgments - Less Wrong

February 6, 2011 at 7:06pm
0 notes

Predicting the Future with Social Media

— [1003.5699v1] Predicting the Future with Social Media